Following the order of the Supreme Court on the petition Monday Jaki Jafri, the result of his statement today depends entirely on the magistrate’s court in Ahmedabad and the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the case against riots.

According to legal experts, the SIT has been studied in its petition, and now is a file, and extra-sheet against the accused in his petition or report a closure if its costs had not been established.

Trained on the bench, and human rights activist Mukul Sinha said that the Supreme Court, it is important, because it is addressed to the court master ready to take the SIT. “Then the court to frame charges against those responsible for the designated sheet filed by the SIT,” said Sinha.

“According to the SC order, the magistrate heard the approval of the closure of the relationship Jakia SIT against certain people,” he added.

Sinha also said that it is important that although the SC ordered the filing of the GIR – a prayer that Jaki – but the court is “the direction, so SIT to submit the final report 173 (2) against 173 (8 ) amount to the complaint Jaki is treated as a basis for further study of the SIT. ”

This means that even if the SIT has not filed an FIR against any person on the basis of the report Jaki, the team of the probe may take action against those involved in riots or download that are not involved. Finally, the court of first instance to the final call and the cost structure against which stands accused by the report of ITE.

Girish Patel, senior lawyer and human rights activist, said it was an extraordinary situation. “The court apex, in this case should have exercised its extraordinary power and decided the case itself rather than directing the courts to take a call,” he said.

He also said that nine years have passed and it will now take longer, when his must submit its report and the judge to take note.

“There are no irregularities and illegalities in the order, but people had high expectations, especially when the apex court had taken such pains to get the facts considered by the SIT,” at he said.

Prakash Thakkar, Senior Advisor to the High Court of Gujarat, said the decision led the court was legal and in the interest of justice. “The Court, if we go through the order, a practice allowed Jaki Jafri demand,” he said.

Thakkar further said that the Supreme Court had ordered the SIT to examine the evidence and arguments, and the criminal complaint before the trial judge, who will make a decision after consulting the victims.

“This is the normal course of action and things are moving. So this is the best way in which the Apex Court would have decided the issue,” he said.

Another senior lawyer, Sudhir Nanavati said: “This is a very good state of matter of law because it interferes with the process of law. This is a normal procedure by which a person must approach the research agency and then the trial court. “He added that the main fact is that the apex court’s decision has stopped monitoring the investigation and court proceedings, and let things take shape through due process.