Just as he was to see her son get settled in life, fat, unpaid, lost his freak accident lift. Seven years after the tragic event, Nalin Acharya has won a lawsuit against the Builder and the lift maintenance contractor to offer a lift breakdown, which led to the death of his 22-year-old son, Hardik.

Acharya now want to use RS 33.6 lakh that he received as compensation for the creation of an organization that will educate residents about “security features” those Builders should provide in lifts to avoid such incidents.

On September 19, 2004, standing on the ninth floor of his residence in Akshardham Apartments, Shahibaug, Hardik looked out the window, falling into the huge wooden door of the crane to check the lift. Suddenly, the lift got off the 10th floor and smashed his head. Hardik was a senior in engineering at Nirma University and earned an R 6 lakh jobs per year with Tata Consultancy Services.

Disputes Redressal Commission Consumer Council, Ahmedabad, has found a Builder, the company president and business houses, which was an annual contract lifting guilty of not providing a lift to the Gujarat Lifts and Escalators Act, 2000 and Rules , 2001. They were ordered to “pay for a bereaved family” of Rs. 33.60 lakh with 9 per cent interest from the accident.

“I can not get my son, but others should not lose their family and I have. Once you receive the compensation money being used for work to ensure the lifts in Ahmedabad by the residents aware of the provisions Act to ‘correct lifts in apartments, “said Acharya, who a company manufacturing industrial weighing. Acharya plans to establish a body to help other legal battles against the Builders.

According to the standards, the window on the lift door for 5 “x 9″ size, equipped with a metal grill and tempered glass. But in this case, it was 7.5 “x9.5″, where the head of a man could easily be integrated, and there was no glass or screens equipped.